Advertisements Galore!
I was at work today listening to a young child argue with his parents about getting a cell phone. They were absolutely sure he was too young to have one. Working at Best Buy, I have heard this story a thousand times, but recently I have been thinking about why exactly parents think this way. So today I walked up to these nice people and asked them why they wouldn’t let their son get a phone. Their answer will be the basis of this week’s discussion.
Sue, Keith, and their son, Jeff, didn’t mind answering a few questions for me. The parents’ answer was simple: “He’s not old enough.” Now while this could mean a hundred different things, I asked them to clarify it a bit. The father was the first to speak up. He told me he didn’t want his kid on the phone all hours of the night or talking to people he didn’t approve of.
I immediately thought of LG Electronic’s Migo cellphone that we recently started carrying (read about it here: http://www.phonescoop.com/phones/phone.php?p=791). It’s a pretty interesting concept phone. You can sign up for the service through Verizon. It is a simplified cell phone that has 5 parent-programmable buttons on the face. Four numbers can be assigned on the keypad, like “Mom,” “Dad,” “Home,” and “Grandmother.” The final button is an emergency contact button. They thought that was a great idea for a phone until I informed them it still cost as much as a regular cell phone to use. That was the mother’s biggest problem. I had no answer for this until I thought about it for a while.
Why is today’s best and most popular communication tool is so expensive to use? My phone bill every month comes to over $70. Why not introduce an advertisement-based cell phone plan to the market? In a society where advertisements are being placed everywhere from in video games to a boxer’s back, why not create a phone that scrolls an advertisement on the LCD or alternates a logo on the screen? While it would stick out on screen and grab your attention, it wouldn’t take away the functionality of your phone. This would generate revenue for both advertisers and your wireless provider which could help offset the cost of a monthly wireless plan.
It’s not like this hasn’t been successful before. Back when NetZero first launched as the world’s first “free” internet provider, they scrolled banner ads on the browser you were using in order to defer the costs of providing a free internet connection. The company operated using that model for quite some time before switching to a pay-based system. I can also remember the websites that promised to give you money simply for surfing the web (as they rotated an advertisement banner on your computer’s desktop).
Now while I am not advocating a complete overhaul of the mobile phone system, I do think this would allow people who could not afford to sign up for a cell phone in the past to finally get one. Even if the advertisements couldn’t pay for a month of cellular use, it could still help out a bit. Even a few bucks off your bill a month for a few advertisements might be worth it for some people. I’m sure I wouldn’t mind and I'm sure Jeff and his parents wouldn't either.
We might even be able to apply this to broadband or wireless internet access too. Who knows what the future will bring?
Until next week, so long.